Algorithmic Rituals

Algorithmic Rituals is a facilitated art experience in which visitors create collaborative movement-based "rituals" to reflect on their technology use habits. After generating a series of movements, attendees incorporate rules for how to relate their movements to those of other attendees, which allows patterns and feedback loops to form. The goal of the experience is to provide an embodied way for attendees to explore technosocial issues around algorithmic decision making and habitual technology use and discuss them in an open, facilitated context. The embodied aspects of movement creation provide a dedicated space for reflection and relation to others. The embodied approach exemplified by Algorithmic Rituals is particularly relevant to questions of bridging embodied methods of thinking about technology with the public in the context of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Discussion-Oriented Teaching in the Digital Classroom: Teachers' Collaborative Adaptation in the Face of Disruption

We examine how a researcher-practitioner research group collaborated to adapt noticing practices in the face of disruptions brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. We used a progress monitoring tool and cognitive field notes to support teacher partners' systematic reflection and to gauge teacher learning. Initial findings suggest these tools helped identify tensions around implementing online class discussions. We highlight the process the teacher partners engaged in as they re-conceptualized engagement, participation, and interaction. © ISLS.

Algorithmic Rituals: Participatory and Embodied Explorations of Algorithmic Decision-Making

Algorithmic Rituals is a facilitated art experience in which visitors create collaborative movement-based "rituals"to reflect on their technology use habits. After generating a series of movements, attendees incorporate rules for how to relate their movements to those of other attendees, which allows patterns and feedback loops to form. The goal of the experience is to provide an embodied way for attendees to explore technosocial issues around algorithmic decision making and habitual technology use and discuss them in an open, facilitated context. The embodied aspects of movement creation provide a dedicated space for reflection and relation to others. The embodied approach exemplified by Algorithmic Rituals is particularly relevant to questions of bridging embodied methods of thinking about technology with the public in the context of the COVID-19 Pandemic. © 2022 Owner/Author.

Platypnea Orthodeoxia Due to a Patent Foramen Ovale and Intrapulmonary Shunting After Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia.

BACKGROUND Platypnea orthodeoxia syndrome (POS) presents with positional dyspnea and hypoxemia defined as arterial desaturation of at least 5% or a drop in PaO2 of at least 4 mmHg. Causes of POS include a variety of cardiopulmonary etiologies and has been reported in patients recovering from severe COVID-19 pneumonia. However, clinical presentation and outcomes in a patient with multiple interrelated mechanisms of shunting has not been documented. CASE REPORT An 85-year-old man hospitalized for hypertensive emergency and severe COVID-19 pneumonia was diagnosed with platypnea orthodeoxia on day 28 of illness. During his disease course, the patient required supplemental oxygen by high-flow nasal cannula but never required invasive mechanical ventilation. Chest imaging revealed evolving mixed consolidation and ground-glass opacities with a patchy and diffuse distribution, involving most of the left lung. Echocardiography was ordered to evaluate for intracardiac shunt, which revealed a patent foramen ovale. Closure of the patent foramen ovale was not pursued. Management included graded progression to standing and supplemental oxygen increases when upright. The patient was discharged to a skilled nursing facility and his positional oxygen requirement resolved on approximately day 78. CONCLUSIONS The present case highlights the multiple interrelated mechanisms of shunting in patients with COVID-related lung disease and a patent foramen ovale. Eight prior cases of POS after COVID-19 pneumonia have been reported to date but none with a known patent foramen ovale. In patients with persistent positional oxygen requirements at follow-up, quantifying shunt fraction over time through multiple modalities can guide treatment decisions.

Suspected orbital myositis associated with COVID-19.

A 44-year-old male patient developed proptosis, edema, and erythema progressing to complete ptosis and supraduction deficit 2 days after positive COVID-19 test. He failed to improve on systemic antibiotics. MRI showed thickening and T2 enhancement of the superior rectus/levator complex consistent with orbital myositis. He improved on intravenous corticosteroids and experienced continued gradual improvement on oral steroids.

EACH: A phase II study evaluating the safety and anti-tumour activity of avelumab and cetuximab in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinomas

Background: Patients with R/M SCC have low response rates to second line therapies, including PD-1 inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab, representing an area of unmet clinical need. Cetuximab has modest activity as a single agent but potentiates the activity of radiotherapy in locally advanced head & neck SCC (HNSCC) and chemotherapy in R/M HNSCC. Cetuximab initiates Natural Killer cell antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, resulting in an anti-tumour immune response and the potential to augment the activity of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition. Methods: Trial entry required histologically confirmed R/M SCC of any site, unselected by PD-L1 expression, considered incurable by local therapies and no previous treatment with cetuximab for recurrent/metastatic disease. Prior therapy with anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-L2 was excluded. Patients had avelumab 10 mg/kg + cetuximab 500 mg/m2 intravenously every 2 weeks, for up to 1 year. Primary endpoint was occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity within 42 days of treatment starting, graded using CTCAE v5. Secondary endpoints were objective response (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) at 6 and 12 months using iRECIST. Results: 16 patients, median age 58 years (range 34 – 88), were enrolled from 2 UK hospitals between July 2018 and October 2019. The trial stopped after completing the safety run-in. 5 patients remain on treatment, 9 stopped treatment early (7 disease progression, 1 patient choice, 1 due to risk of COVID-19). 2 patients died whilst on treatment (both unrelated to trial treatment). Grade 3 AEs were seen in 4 patients and grade 5 in 1 patient. None were related to trial treatment. No patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity. Of 10 patients evaluable for response by iRECIST 2 (20%) had complete response, 3 (30%) had partial response and 4 (40%) had stable disease as their best response, representing an ORR of 50%. One patient had confirmed disease progression. In 6 patients who remained on trial for >6 months, all 6 had disease control at 6 months (2 CR, 1 PR, 3 SD). Conclusions: Avelumab + cetuximab is safe and tolerable, and demonstrates promising efficacy in R/M SCC patients. Clinical trial identification: NCT03494322;20/03/2018;Sponsor reference: UCL/17/0560. Legal entity responsible for the study: University College London. Funding: Merck KGaA. Disclosure: M. Forster: Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: BMS;Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck;Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: MSD;Advisory/Consultancy: Novartis;Advisory/Consultancy: PharmaMar;Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche;Advisory/Consultancy: Nanobiotix;Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Guardant Health;Advisory/Consultancy: Oxford VacMedix;Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: AstraZeneca;Advisory/Consultancy: Takeda;Research grant/Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim;Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Celgene. J. Sacco: Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: BMS;Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: MSD;Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Amgen;Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Immunocore;Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Delcath;Honoraria (self): Pierre Fabre;Research grant/Funding (institution): AstraZeneca. A. Kong: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck;Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: BMS;Advisory/Consultancy: Centauri Therapeutics;Advisory/Consultancy: Amgen;Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Puma Biotechnology;Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: MSD;Research grant/Funding (institution): AstraZeneca. G. Wheeler: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca. J. Hartley: Full/Part-t me employment: AstraZeneca;Advisory/Consultancy, Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options: ADC Therapeutics. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.